Tree interfering with street light and telephone lines
Reported via mobile in the Rights of way category anonymously at 12:06, Sat 23 September 2023
Sent to Hampshire County Council less than a minute later. FixMyStreet ref: 5023670.
A tree outside 6 Hurstville Drive, Waterlooville is interfering with a number of telephone wires strung from a telegraph pole, and a street light (3).
This is a practical example of a tree too close the carriageway. The tree is less than 12 feet from the centre of the made-up carriageway.
The attached image is old and the tree has grown since.
Recently the constituency MP was reminded in a letter from Richard Holden, Minister for Roads and Transport, that Section 96(6) of The Highways Act 1980 states:
"(6)No tree, shrub, grass verge, guard or fence shall be planted, laid out or erected under this section, or, if planted, laid out or erected under this section, allowed to remain, in such a situation as to hinder the reasonable use of the highway by any person entitled to use it, or so as to be a nuisance or injurious to the owner or occupier of premises adjacent to the highway."
A tree which causes damage to telephone lines serving nearby residences and blocks illuminance from a street light is a nuisance and can be injurious to owners and occupiers of premises adjacent to the highway.
Such interference is one of the reasons the 15 feet rule was encompassed in primary statute and has remained in primary statute continually for over 187 years.
Blocking of light can be construed as hindering the reasonable use of the highway by any person entitled to use it.
In accordance with Section 96(6) the tree should not be allowed to remain, in such a situation.
Updates
-
Still open, via questionnaire, 15:45, Sat 21 October 2023
-
Hampshire County Council has refused to take any action.
If the tree is blown down in a storm, and there have been three violent storms in succession recently, it will take the telephone wire with it and may damage the telegraph pole.
If an occupier is trying to contact emergency services by landline and loses their connection owing to the negligence of the council staff that person could die, all because the council thinks trees are more important than human life
This is not exaggerated and there are precedents.
Posted anonymously at 06:46, Sun 19 November 2023
Still open, via questionnaire -
Still open, via questionnaire, 07:47, Sun 17 December 2023
-
Still open, via questionnaire, 04:49, Monday 15 January 2024
-
Disregarded by the county council
Posted anonymously at 09:31, Monday 12 February 2024
Still open, via questionnaire -
Still disregarded by the county council and soon it will get worse with new growth.
Posted anonymously at 13:43, Monday 11 March 2024
Still open, via questionnaire -
Still open, via questionnaire, 08:45, Tuesday 9 April 2024
-
Ignored by the council
Posted anonymously at 14:33, Tuesday 7 May 2024
Still open, via questionnaire -
Still open, via questionnaire, 16:17, Tuesday 4 June 2024
-
Still open, via questionnaire, 19:43, Tuesday 2 July 2024
-
Disregarded by the county council
Posted anonymously at 05:34, Wednesday 31 July 2024
Still open, via questionnaire -
Still open, via questionnaire, 10:22, Wednesday 28 August 2024
-
Still open, via questionnaire, 14:38, Wednesday 25 September 2024
-
Still open, via questionnaire, 04:31, Thursday 24 October 2024
-
Still open, via questionnaire, 13:43, Thursday 21 November 2024
Only the original reporter may leave updates. If you made the original report please log in to leave an update.