Speed limit signs unapproved and missing.

Updates

• NCC ref:

  Your enquiry ENQ-587284-K4C7M6 received on 21/09/2022 12:41:30 regarding Highways Maintenance: Road Signs & Posts has been updated.

  New Status: We are investigating the problem - Defects are investigated by local teams as soon as possible and, if action is required, prioritised for repair taking into account the defect size, location and usage of the road or path in question.

  Posted anonymously at 22:49, Wed 21 September 2022

• 26 09 22 NCC reply:

  Your enquiry ENQ-587284-K4C7M6 received on 21/09/2022 12:41:30 regarding Highways Maintenance: Road Signs & Posts has been updated.

  New Status: No action has been taken at this time but we will continue to monitor the problem -We have assessed that the defect does not currently meet our intervention criteria. We will continue to monitor as part of normal scheduled inspections.

  Any additional comments the Highways Officer has made relating to this enquiry will be displayed below: site inspected and defects sent to ncc site manager for s278 works for remedials

  Posted anonymously at 00:34, Fri 30 September 2022

• 27 09 22. To NCC:

  Dear Sir/Madam

  I received the (above reply) as a response to my report of an unapproved, and therefore illegal speed limit sign, (part of which is also missing).

  The content of the reply is contradictory:

  "No action has been taken at this time but we will continue to monitor the problem -We have assessed that the defect does not currently meet our intervention criteria"

  And

  "site inspected and defects sent to ncc site manager for s278 works for remedials" (sic)

  Please could you confirm your intended course of action, specifically, are you going to install a speed limit sign that complies with the legally required standards or are you going to take ‘no further action’ over this defect.

  Thanks for your assistance.

  Posted anonymously at 00:37, Fri 30 September 2022

• New NCC ref: ENQ-588556-T3J7T6

  Posted anonymously at 00:38, Fri 30 September 2022

• 29 09 22 From NCC clarifying the apparent contradiction:

  Thank you for your recent enquiry reference number ENQ-588556-T3J7T6, details of which are summarised below together with our response.

  Highways FAQs (Follow Up/Chasing Contact) : The defect I reported has been closed and I am not sure about/or disagree with the action that's been taken.

  Thank you for your enquiry. The area in question has been widened as part of associated works paid for and done by contractors for the Mcdonalds development under a section 278 agreement. They have installed the incorrect/missing sign. I have passed this issue (along with other remedial works noted) to the NCC officer in charge of managing the agreement to get the contractor to make correct. The 'no action' comes from a no defect that will be programmed for works for our routine maintenance team, hence the explanation in the notes you received. Regards Mark.

  Thank you for contacting Norfolk County Council.

  Customer Service Team Norfolk County Council

  Posted anonymously at 00:41, Fri 30 September 2022

• Nothing has been done about this sign.

  Posted anonymously at 16:41, Tue 18 October 2022
  Still open, via questionnaire

• Nothing has been done about this sign.

  Posted anonymously at 18:34, Tue 15 November 2022
  Still open, via questionnaire

• No change.

  Posted anonymously at 19:10, Tue 13 December 2022
  Still open, via questionnaire

• No change.

  Posted anonymously at 19:31, Tue 10 January 2023
  Still open, via questionnaire